Advertising value equivalency (AVE) is a discredited method of valuing earned media coverage by estimating what the same space or airtime would have cost as paid advertising. The Barcelona Principles for PR measurement explicitly reject it, stating plainly that AVEs are not the value of communication.
Advertising value equivalency attempts to put a dollar figure on earned media coverage by calculating what it would have cost to buy the same amount of space in a publication, or the same airtime on a broadcast, as an advertisement. On its face this offers a simple, comparable number, which is part of why the method persisted in PR reporting for many years.
The method's core flaw is that editorial coverage and paid advertising are not equivalent products: a news article is written by an independent journalist, carries the credibility of that outlet's editorial judgment, and cannot be bought or fully controlled by the subject of the story, while an advertisement is a controlled, purchased message. Multiplying a column-inch or airtime cost by an arbitrary factor to account for this difference, a common practice in older AVE calculations, does not resolve the underlying mismatch.
Because of these problems, the Barcelona Principles for communication measurement, first agreed in 2010 and reaffirmed in later revisions, explicitly reject AVEs, stating that they are not the value of communication and pushing the profession toward outcome-based measurement instead. Any AVE-style figure presented as the 'value' of coverage should be treated with significant skepticism.
How to: 1) Avoid presenting an advertising value equivalency figure as the value of earned coverage. 2) If a stakeholder specifically asks for an AVE number, explain the Barcelona Principles' rejection of the method and its known flaws. 3) Substitute outcome-based measures relevant to the actual goal, such as changes in awareness, engagement or behavior, where these can genuinely be measured. 4) Report coverage in terms of what it says and where it appeared, not a manufactured dollar figure.
QUESTIONS
What is advertising value equivalency?
It is a method that estimates the monetary value of earned media coverage by calculating what the same amount of space or airtime would have cost as paid advertising, producing a dollar figure meant to represent the coverage's worth.
Why is advertising value equivalency considered flawed?
Because earned editorial coverage and paid advertising are fundamentally different: coverage reflects independent journalistic judgment and cannot be bought outright, so pricing it as if it were an advertisement misrepresents both its nature and its actual value.
Do the Barcelona Principles allow advertising value equivalency?
No. Every version of the Barcelona Principles explicitly rejects AVEs, stating directly that they are not the value of communication, and instead pushes toward outcome-based, qualitative and quantitative measurement.
What should be used instead of AVE figures?
Outcome-based measures tied to the actual goal of a campaign, combined with qualitative assessment of coverage quality and quantitative tracking of mentions and engagement, rather than a single manufactured dollar equivalence.
SOURCES
Last reviewed